Sabtu, 31 Desember 2011
Year End at Crabbit Towers
I wasn't going to blog today, or even tomorrow, but I had a bit of happifying news to end the year with today, and it relates to you. I had my first royalty statement for Write to be Published and I was very pleasantly surprised at the figures. So, I'd like to thank you all for your support! It doesn't matter whether you bought the book: so many of you recommended it or chatted about it on
Selasa, 27 Desember 2011
Interview with my cover artist Carl Graves
I've known Carl Graves for 24 years, and he's a close friend of mine. We've worked on numerous projects together, and I've never met anyone more talented, in any field, than Carl is. He blows my mind he's so good.

Joe: You've got a lot of different styles. For example, your covers for Lisa Jackson look different than your covers for James Swain.


Carl: Thanks. Some of my covers I'm very proud of. Others, I did what the author wanted, and I don't feel they're as strong. But I work for the author, and if the author wants to go down a certain path, I do what they ask.

Carl: I realize that, and I truly apologize for anyone I've inconvenienced. This has been a pretty tough year for me. Family problems, job issues, health issues, and some major computer/internet issues. I've lost some business, and people have been irritated because I haven't communicated like I needed to. I'm human, and I got in over my head.
Joe: Writers tend to be needy.
Carl: I understand that a lot better than I did. I have a background (in animation) where dealines could be months, or even a year down the road. With a Big 6 book, the book comes out months after the cover art is done. There is never any rush.

Carl: I realize that now.
Joe: How is your schedule these days?
Carl: Thankfully, a lot better. If someone emails me, I'll be in touch with 24 hours (weekends or holidays 48 hours.) This is now my fulltime job. When you contact me, we can talk about what you need, and I'll give you an honest estimate on how long it will take. Usually a week or less. If a writer needs a lot of changes, it can take a bit longer.
Joe: You've always done my covers pretty quickly.

Joe: How are your prices?
Joe: Hey! I did that with my first covers!
Carl: And how did they sell?
Joe: When I had you redo them, sales went up 30%. Better covers equal better sales. how can people get in touch with you?
Carl: On my website, www.extendedimagery.com.
Joe: So have you ever done covers for authors and they didn't pay? Or they didn't like the end result?
Carl: Funny you should mention that. I currently have ten completed ebook covers that need good homes. If any authors reading this have written books that these covers would fit, email me and I'll let you have them for fire sale prices.
Joe: What's a fire sale price?
Carl: Each of the covers shown below is $150. That's as-is. The writer gives me their name, their title, and they get a 300dpi (high resolution) ebook cover.
Joe: $150 is dirt cheap. And these covers are terrific.
Carl: Thanks. If any author wants to change some things, or add some things, I can do that as well, but I have to charge a bit extra for that, depending on how extensive the changes are. And for an extra $100, I can add a spine and a back cover, so these can be used for paper books on Lulu or Createspace.
Joe: I assume you're only selling these once.
Carl: Right. Each of these is unique. Once someone buys it, it is theirs and theirs alone. So this is first come, first serve. Once it's gone, it's gone.
If you want to inquire about one of these covers, or you want to hire me to do a cover for you, email me. Please specify which cover you're interested in (the number is beneath the image.)
Free
I've sold 7000 ebooks in the last 36 hours, making over $14,000.
For the next three days, I'm making 23 of my titles free on Amazon Kindle.
http://www.amazon.com/J.A.-Konrath/e/B000BCH4EM
Blake Crouch is doing the same.
http://www.amazon.com/Blake-Crouch/e/B001H6U8X0
Get them while they're free. :)
For the next three days, I'm making 23 of my titles free on Amazon Kindle.
http://www.amazon.com/J.A.-Konrath/e/B000BCH4EM
Blake Crouch is doing the same.
http://www.amazon.com/Blake-Crouch/e/B001H6U8X0
Get them while they're free. :)
Senin, 26 Desember 2011
The List, A Story of Rejection
Just went through some of my old rejection letters. As readers of this blog know, I garnered more than 500 rejections before getting published.
One of my unpublished books was The List.

A billionaire Senator with money to burn...
A thirty year old science experiment, about to be revealed...
Seven people, marked for death, not for what they know, but for what they are...
THE LIST by JA Konrath
History is about to repeat itself
Book Description:
THE LIST is a bit of a departure for Konrath. It's a technothriller about a group of ten people who each have tattoos of numbers on the bottoms their feet, and don't know why.
One of them, a Chicago Homicide cop named Tom Mankowski, has had one of these strange tattoos since birth. When he investigates a violent murder and discovers the victim also has a tattooed number, it sets the ball rolling for an adventure of historic proportions.
To say more would give away too much.
The above description was, more or less, the query letter that my agent sent out to over a dozen top editors.
Here are some of the rejections The List received:
Here is The List. I'm returning it to you. Sorry it didn't work out at Ballantine, hope you'll place it elsewhere soon. - Ballantine Books
As discussed, The List by Joe Konrath isn't a book for me. Thank you, and I'm sorry. - Penguin Putnam
Thanks for letting me see The List by Joe Konrath. While it's certainly not a plot I've seen before--at least the cloning part--it seems very familiar all the same, plus the humor in the storytelling seems a little forced and sitcom-ish, and finally exhausted my interest. So it has to be a pass for me. Despite my reservations about The List, I suspect the originality of the concept will prove a lure to someone, and I wish you all the best with it. - Simon & Schuster
I have just taken on a thriller with comparable qualities, and we have such a small list that I can only afford to publish one novel of this kind every year. So, a pass, but many thanks for sending it my way. - Talk Miramax Books
Thanks for sending me The List by Joe Konrath. There's much to like here--particularly the author's savvy prose and the way he ieasily integrates his knowledge of police procedures into the story. As for the plot, I was initially intrigued by the way the protagonist was linked to the murders, but ultimately I had issues with it. I had a hard time believing inthe way he learned about his bizaree adoption taking it so well and regarding it simply as another clue surrounding the murders. I suppose the story twists from that point on were harder to swallow. But this is just my opinion, of course... I'm sure other editors will disagree. - Doubleday
Thanks for letting me read Joe Kramath's (sic) The List. I', sorry to say that despite the good writing and humor, I think the story may be too fabulous for us to publish it successfully. Thanks again and best of luck to you and the author. - Little, Brown and Company
As you know, Will passed along to me The List by Jo (sic) Konrath, which I read with great interest. It's certainly an original premise, and Konrath has an engaging style. I'm afraid though that ultimately we weren't sufficiently drawn into the thriller aspects of the novel, and thus have decided to pass. Thanks very much for thinking of us for this. I'll be interested to hear where this lands. - Hyperion (who later went on to publish six of my later novels)
Thanks so much for the look at The List by Joe Konrath. Needless to say, I found the premise extremely imaginative and original, and the author does a remarkable job balancing the brisk pacing with humor. In the end, however, I just thought it would be hard for us to really break this out in a competitive fiction market, as its novelty seems to hamper its commercial potential. - New American Library
I must say the cop-protagonist of this novel is one of the brightest lights in the clone world, an exact replica of Thomas Jefferson. But as I kept reading, the improbabilities kept bumping into each other and I just couldn't believe the storyline. Thank you for letting me see this, and I wish I could be more enthusiastic. HarperCollins Publishers
Thank you for sending me The List by Joe Konrath. I liked the set-up for this novel a great deal--a detective investigation a murder finds that the victim shares the same enigmatic tattoo that he possesses. Unfortunately, I just didn't think the rest of the novel could sustain that sense of eerie anticipation. The reason for the tattoos, that all participants were part of a secret government cloning experiment, just seemed a little too familiar, and the constant joking, while witty at times, also eroded the tension and sense of menace. I appreciate the look and hope another editor feels differently. Bantam Dell Publishing Group
I shared The List by Joe Konrath with some colleagues here. Several found it amusing but ultimately we felt it was a bit too odd and were concerned about the audience. So I will be declining. William Morrow
I certainly give Joe Konrath lots of credit for trying to put forth a most creative and different kind of thriller involving clones of famous people. And for the most part his wise-cracking dialogue held my attention, too. But int he final analysis, I just thought he tried to hard in this over-the-top novel. I just think it would be a very difficult thriller to sell to our sales force in a major way. The credibility factor is strained a wee bit too much. As such, I'm returning it with my regrets, but with my thanks for the look. - Warner Books
Thank you for sending The List by Joe Konrath. It has a lot going for it--especially certain moments of humor--but in the end it seemed too much like the novelization of a movie than a genuine novel. The characters are types, and the echoes of such movies as Lethal Weapon became distracting. if this really were a movie tie-in, I could see pursuing it, but as it is, I'm going to pass. I'm sure you'll find the right home for it, though. - Pocket Books
Thanks for following up so promptly and sending The List by Joe Konrath. I believe the idea is strong and the writer has great style.Unfortunately, I can not take this manuscript on in the state that it is in. To begin with, it is simply too long. The writer needs to trim his work down a good deal. The story is also too riddled with conversation, which slows down the pace and is cumbersome to read. It lacks the spark and sustained suspense required to stand out on the crowded fiction shelf. - St. Martin's Press
In April of 2009, I self-published The List.
As of this writing, December 26, 2011, The List has earned me over $100,000.
Right now it is in the Kindle Top 100 again (it has cracked the Top 100 four different times since I published it.)
What does that translate into sales?
The novel, rejected by everyone, is right now selling over 100 copies an hour, currently earning $3.50 a minute. That's $210 an hour, $5040 a day. And it seems to be picking up speed.
Hopefully, it will catch up to my novel Trapped, which is also in the Top 100 (for the third time) and is currently ranked at #73. Trapped was part of a two book deal with Grand Central, but they rejected it. I published it myself in June of 2010. Since then, it has earned me more than $100,000.
So I'd like to take this opportunity to send warm holiday cheer and sincere thanks the editors at HarperCollins, Bantam Dell, Hyperion, NAL, Simon & Schuster, Doubleday, William Morrow, Warner Books, St. Martin's Press, Ballantine, Penguin Putnam, Talk Miramax, Pocket Books, Little, Brown and Company, for rejecting The List. And thanks to Grand Central for rejecting Trapped.
Much success to you all in 2012.
And just to show my story isn't unique, my friend and writing partner, Blake Crouch, recently had a similar experience with his novel Run. It was shopped during the fall of 2010 to a dozen major publishers, all of whom rejected it. Since Blake published Run himself in March, it has sold over 40,000 copies, and is currently ranked at #92 in the Kindle store. In the last 48 hours alone, it has sold over 2000 copies.
Blake and I want to wish all of those editors who rejected us a very Happy New Year.
One of my unpublished books was The List.

A billionaire Senator with money to burn...
A thirty year old science experiment, about to be revealed...
Seven people, marked for death, not for what they know, but for what they are...
THE LIST by JA Konrath
History is about to repeat itself
Book Description:
THE LIST is a bit of a departure for Konrath. It's a technothriller about a group of ten people who each have tattoos of numbers on the bottoms their feet, and don't know why.
One of them, a Chicago Homicide cop named Tom Mankowski, has had one of these strange tattoos since birth. When he investigates a violent murder and discovers the victim also has a tattooed number, it sets the ball rolling for an adventure of historic proportions.
To say more would give away too much.
The above description was, more or less, the query letter that my agent sent out to over a dozen top editors.
Here are some of the rejections The List received:
Here is The List. I'm returning it to you. Sorry it didn't work out at Ballantine, hope you'll place it elsewhere soon. - Ballantine Books
As discussed, The List by Joe Konrath isn't a book for me. Thank you, and I'm sorry. - Penguin Putnam
Thanks for letting me see The List by Joe Konrath. While it's certainly not a plot I've seen before--at least the cloning part--it seems very familiar all the same, plus the humor in the storytelling seems a little forced and sitcom-ish, and finally exhausted my interest. So it has to be a pass for me. Despite my reservations about The List, I suspect the originality of the concept will prove a lure to someone, and I wish you all the best with it. - Simon & Schuster
I have just taken on a thriller with comparable qualities, and we have such a small list that I can only afford to publish one novel of this kind every year. So, a pass, but many thanks for sending it my way. - Talk Miramax Books
Thanks for sending me The List by Joe Konrath. There's much to like here--particularly the author's savvy prose and the way he ieasily integrates his knowledge of police procedures into the story. As for the plot, I was initially intrigued by the way the protagonist was linked to the murders, but ultimately I had issues with it. I had a hard time believing inthe way he learned about his bizaree adoption taking it so well and regarding it simply as another clue surrounding the murders. I suppose the story twists from that point on were harder to swallow. But this is just my opinion, of course... I'm sure other editors will disagree. - Doubleday
Thanks for letting me read Joe Kramath's (sic) The List. I', sorry to say that despite the good writing and humor, I think the story may be too fabulous for us to publish it successfully. Thanks again and best of luck to you and the author. - Little, Brown and Company
As you know, Will passed along to me The List by Jo (sic) Konrath, which I read with great interest. It's certainly an original premise, and Konrath has an engaging style. I'm afraid though that ultimately we weren't sufficiently drawn into the thriller aspects of the novel, and thus have decided to pass. Thanks very much for thinking of us for this. I'll be interested to hear where this lands. - Hyperion (who later went on to publish six of my later novels)
Thanks so much for the look at The List by Joe Konrath. Needless to say, I found the premise extremely imaginative and original, and the author does a remarkable job balancing the brisk pacing with humor. In the end, however, I just thought it would be hard for us to really break this out in a competitive fiction market, as its novelty seems to hamper its commercial potential. - New American Library
I must say the cop-protagonist of this novel is one of the brightest lights in the clone world, an exact replica of Thomas Jefferson. But as I kept reading, the improbabilities kept bumping into each other and I just couldn't believe the storyline. Thank you for letting me see this, and I wish I could be more enthusiastic. HarperCollins Publishers
Thank you for sending me The List by Joe Konrath. I liked the set-up for this novel a great deal--a detective investigation a murder finds that the victim shares the same enigmatic tattoo that he possesses. Unfortunately, I just didn't think the rest of the novel could sustain that sense of eerie anticipation. The reason for the tattoos, that all participants were part of a secret government cloning experiment, just seemed a little too familiar, and the constant joking, while witty at times, also eroded the tension and sense of menace. I appreciate the look and hope another editor feels differently. Bantam Dell Publishing Group
I shared The List by Joe Konrath with some colleagues here. Several found it amusing but ultimately we felt it was a bit too odd and were concerned about the audience. So I will be declining. William Morrow
I certainly give Joe Konrath lots of credit for trying to put forth a most creative and different kind of thriller involving clones of famous people. And for the most part his wise-cracking dialogue held my attention, too. But int he final analysis, I just thought he tried to hard in this over-the-top novel. I just think it would be a very difficult thriller to sell to our sales force in a major way. The credibility factor is strained a wee bit too much. As such, I'm returning it with my regrets, but with my thanks for the look. - Warner Books
Thank you for sending The List by Joe Konrath. It has a lot going for it--especially certain moments of humor--but in the end it seemed too much like the novelization of a movie than a genuine novel. The characters are types, and the echoes of such movies as Lethal Weapon became distracting. if this really were a movie tie-in, I could see pursuing it, but as it is, I'm going to pass. I'm sure you'll find the right home for it, though. - Pocket Books
Thanks for following up so promptly and sending The List by Joe Konrath. I believe the idea is strong and the writer has great style.Unfortunately, I can not take this manuscript on in the state that it is in. To begin with, it is simply too long. The writer needs to trim his work down a good deal. The story is also too riddled with conversation, which slows down the pace and is cumbersome to read. It lacks the spark and sustained suspense required to stand out on the crowded fiction shelf. - St. Martin's Press
In April of 2009, I self-published The List.
As of this writing, December 26, 2011, The List has earned me over $100,000.
Right now it is in the Kindle Top 100 again (it has cracked the Top 100 four different times since I published it.)
What does that translate into sales?
The novel, rejected by everyone, is right now selling over 100 copies an hour, currently earning $3.50 a minute. That's $210 an hour, $5040 a day. And it seems to be picking up speed.
Hopefully, it will catch up to my novel Trapped, which is also in the Top 100 (for the third time) and is currently ranked at #73. Trapped was part of a two book deal with Grand Central, but they rejected it. I published it myself in June of 2010. Since then, it has earned me more than $100,000.
So I'd like to take this opportunity to send warm holiday cheer and sincere thanks the editors at HarperCollins, Bantam Dell, Hyperion, NAL, Simon & Schuster, Doubleday, William Morrow, Warner Books, St. Martin's Press, Ballantine, Penguin Putnam, Talk Miramax, Pocket Books, Little, Brown and Company, for rejecting The List. And thanks to Grand Central for rejecting Trapped.
Much success to you all in 2012.
And just to show my story isn't unique, my friend and writing partner, Blake Crouch, recently had a similar experience with his novel Run. It was shopped during the fall of 2010 to a dozen major publishers, all of whom rejected it. Since Blake published Run himself in March, it has sold over 40,000 copies, and is currently ranked at #92 in the Kindle store. In the last 48 hours alone, it has sold over 2000 copies.
Blake and I want to wish all of those editors who rejected us a very Happy New Year.
Rabu, 21 Desember 2011
Student bingo
Posted by Jean Adams
Every year I supervise a number of undergraduate and postgraduate students doing project work. Mostly, I love this part of my job. I love students’ enthusiasm. I love seeing them progress from unsure about everything, to confident expert. And I love amusing myself by playing student bingo.
Every year I supervise a number of undergraduate and postgraduate students doing project work. Mostly, I love this part of my job. I love students’ enthusiasm. I love seeing them progress from unsure about everything, to confident expert. And I love amusing myself by playing student bingo.
Student bingo can be played alone or in groups.
Here's how to play:
1. Choose your student.
2. Write a list of the top five rooky errors associated with your student's project. These might include: failing to back up the only copy of a thesis in progress; failing to plan enough time for obtaining ethics permission; failing to learn how to use EndNote early on leading to a referencing melt-down on the day before submission etc.
3. Warn your student early that they are likely to make these errors.
4. Check frequently that these errors have not been made.
5. Tick off the errors as they are made.
6. Never, ever express disappointment that your student has made an error that you expressly warned them about (remember the supervisor = mother rule).
7. If playing in a group, the first supervisor to tick off all their errors and stand up in the middle of the open-plan office shouting "STUDENT BINGO" is the winner.
Great Yarmouth bingo |
Dinner
Posted by Jean Adams
In my experience, there are two possible plans of action in that moment between drinks and dinner when everyone hovers around the table wondering if there is a seating plan.
Plan A is to actively manoeuvre to ensure that you sit next to the most interesting people. Plan B is to hang back and grab the last seat. Obviously Plan B is the introverts preferred method. But there is a real risk that everyone else is following Plan A. Meaning that Plan B’ers find themselves, by default, left sitting next to the very least interesting people.
In my experience, there are two possible plans of action in that moment between drinks and dinner when everyone hovers around the table wondering if there is a seating plan.
Plan A is to actively manoeuvre to ensure that you sit next to the most interesting people. Plan B is to hang back and grab the last seat. Obviously Plan B is the introverts preferred method. But there is a real risk that everyone else is following Plan A. Meaning that Plan B’ers find themselves, by default, left sitting next to the very least interesting people.
The other evening I found myself at a work related dinner where I hardly knew anyone. I knew the people I probably didn’t want to sit next to. So I manoeuvred away from them. But I took my chances with the rest.
I was rather taken aback when, around 20 minutes into the dinner, the man on my right said in a rather loud voice: “Well, I used to be on the monetary policy committee, you know. I disagreed with Mervyn King about almost everything.”
Mervyn King |
I guess we are all victims of surrounding ourselves with opinions that agree with our own. I feel quite privileged to work in a professional arena where my political opinions are mainstream, and are almost part and parcel of the job. It’s nice to work somewhere where you feel your colleagues so strongly agree with your worldview.
So it was a bit of a shock to be at a work dinner with an economist who turned out to be just a little bit to the right of me. It turned out he lives in New Hampshire – a beautiful part of the world, where the state motto is “Live free or die”. They don’t have sales tax or state income tax in New Hampshire. This means there are limited public services. But it’s okay – because “there’s a market”. You need your garbage collected – “there’s a market”, you need the snow swept from your drive – “there’s a market”, you need some health care – “there’s a market”.
“So what do the people in New Hampshire who can’t afford those things do?” I asked.
“They live in Vermont.”
Apparently a new liberal era has washed in and the students are trying to get “Live free or die” replaced with the much more politically correct “Live free or move”.
The application system
Posted by Jean Adams
I knew it was going to be bad so I ignored it. But you can’t ignore important things forever. Yesterday, I finally plucked up the courage to take a good, hard look at the form. It was every bit as bad as predicted.
I am preparing a grant application for a national health research funding body. It is endless. There is the on-line form (34 pages). Then there is the detailed project description (20 pages). Then there is the one page project timetable appendix. Finally, there’s the summary flow diagram appendix. You can understand the need for this last appendix. It must be hard for the committee to get their heads around all the detail that they receive for each application. What they need is a simple, graphical summary of the project.
It is possible that research grant giving bodies feel that only researchers who can negotiate complex application systems deserve funding. It has also crossed my mind that research grant giving bodies are holding a secret competition to see who can devise the most fiendish system.
Our response? Our response is to protest that we are scientists: it is not our job to fill in difficult forms. We must have support.
Ignoring the boxes that really only I can fill in, I start to make the rounds of the people who might be able to help with my form.
First stop, my secretary. That sounds a bit grandiose. Really, she is the secretary that I have a 20% share of. Could she maybe input all the CV information for me and the other grant applicants? Of course, but when you say put in details of everyone’s current grants, do you really mean all of the 21 grants that Prof. Important from London has running? Sorry. Yes.
Next, the finance officer. Who is also doing a part-time PhD in Medical Ethics. Sure, she can make a start on the numbers. This says draft finance at the top, are there likely to be some changes? Sorry. Yes.
Then, right at the end, after the scientific summary and the lay summary, after the CVs of all applicants, and after the endless breakdown of exactly how much money we are asking for, there are the tick boxes. Oooh. My favourite bit – just tick a few boxes to indicate your ethnic group and your scientific discipline. It’s so easy!
I print out the form to get a handle on what’s left to be done.
Right at the end there is a page for signatures. They need signatures? This didn’t show on screen. How am I supposed to get signatures from colleagues all across the country just before Christmas?
I knew it was going to be bad so I ignored it. But you can’t ignore important things forever. Yesterday, I finally plucked up the courage to take a good, hard look at the form. It was every bit as bad as predicted.
I am preparing a grant application for a national health research funding body. It is endless. There is the on-line form (34 pages). Then there is the detailed project description (20 pages). Then there is the one page project timetable appendix. Finally, there’s the summary flow diagram appendix. You can understand the need for this last appendix. It must be hard for the committee to get their heads around all the detail that they receive for each application. What they need is a simple, graphical summary of the project.
It is possible that research grant giving bodies feel that only researchers who can negotiate complex application systems deserve funding. It has also crossed my mind that research grant giving bodies are holding a secret competition to see who can devise the most fiendish system.
Our response? Our response is to protest that we are scientists: it is not our job to fill in difficult forms. We must have support.
Ignoring the boxes that really only I can fill in, I start to make the rounds of the people who might be able to help with my form.
First stop, my secretary. That sounds a bit grandiose. Really, she is the secretary that I have a 20% share of. Could she maybe input all the CV information for me and the other grant applicants? Of course, but when you say put in details of everyone’s current grants, do you really mean all of the 21 grants that Prof. Important from London has running? Sorry. Yes.
Next, the finance officer. Who is also doing a part-time PhD in Medical Ethics. Sure, she can make a start on the numbers. This says draft finance at the top, are there likely to be some changes? Sorry. Yes.
Then, right at the end, after the scientific summary and the lay summary, after the CVs of all applicants, and after the endless breakdown of exactly how much money we are asking for, there are the tick boxes. Oooh. My favourite bit – just tick a few boxes to indicate your ethnic group and your scientific discipline. It’s so easy!
I print out the form to get a handle on what’s left to be done.
Right at the end there is a page for signatures. They need signatures? This didn’t show on screen. How am I supposed to get signatures from colleagues all across the country just before Christmas?
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)